1995-12-26 - Re: Only accepting e-mail from known parties

Header Data

From: “Robert A. Rosenberg” <hal9001@panix.com>
To: tallpaul@pipeline.com (tallpaul)
Message Hash: ed501fa1b5bd4fd851636999f06710a45c18c9d96dd93caa0e99ce00ef529ae2
Message ID: <v02140a02ad04b40c72a1@[165.254.158.223]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-26 23:20:18 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 27 Dec 1995 07:20:18 +0800

Raw message

From: "Robert A. Rosenberg" <hal9001@panix.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 1995 07:20:18 +0800
To: tallpaul@pipeline.com (tallpaul)
Subject: Re: Only accepting e-mail from known parties
Message-ID: <v02140a02ad04b40c72a1@[165.254.158.223]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 14:33 12/25/95, tallpaul wrote:

>Thoughts? (I see one problem with this but it should be able to be worked
>out once the basic method is agreed to).

I assume that the "Problem" is that by only giving each corespondent ONE
E-Stamp, you are single streaming your connections with them (ie: Are
talking Half-Duplex). Not only are they restricted to one message
"in-flight" but they can not start another message until they have done a
capture run to acquire your ACK and get the new key.







Thread