From: Anonymous
To: N/A
Message Hash: dae43ef0dae850c1ddfa4ba7249d600adf3f6c382b552da7997f71007127efa5
Message ID: <d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e@NO-ID-FOUND.mhonarc.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: (Unknown Date)
Raw Date: N/A
From: Anonymous
Date: Tue Sep 07 12:51:07 1999
Subject: No Subject
Message-ID: <d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e@NO-ID-FOUND.mhonarc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Hal Finney wrote:
> I'm not sure how to do it for software, but for novels it
> should be easy to fingerprint. Every couple of pages the
> author writes a sentence twice in different forms. This would
> not take a great deal of extra effort on the part of the
> author.
Perhaps. Some authors might be offended by the idea that
using a different form of a sentence doesn't affect the work.
> Perhaps a similar approach could be applied to software, where
> in many cases a couple of statements could be trivially
> interchanged, or other kinds of simple transformations could
> be manually generated. Those could be marked by the
> programmers without too much extra work.
Sounds like a disaster to me, unless it can be done
automatically, by a proven-correct program. I used to use
commercial compilers that (at least claimed to) put their
"stamp" on the assembly code they generated, so they could sue
if you released a product without having a license for the
compiler. Bugs are bad enough as it is; we don't need extra
ones that only show up in some copies!
Will French <wfrench@interport.net>
Return to “Anonymous”
(Unknown Date) (None) - No Subject - Anonymous