1996-01-24 - Re: Crippled Notes export encryption

Header Data

From: jpb@miamisci.org (Joe Block)
To: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Message Hash: 01673864d52e50ae6678745897f0688b0d642cf3b604d3456033d8547a5f0c0e
Message ID: <v01520c0aad2c16d83824@[199.227.1.222]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-24 19:44:58 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 25 Jan 1996 03:44:58 +0800

Raw message

From: jpb@miamisci.org (Joe Block)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 1996 03:44:58 +0800
To: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Crippled Notes export encryption
Message-ID: <v01520c0aad2c16d83824@[199.227.1.222]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 11:50 PM 1/23/96, you wrote:
>The problem is whether you can separate the functionality of what you're
>exporting sufficiently from what you're contracting out that the exported
>material isn't a "component of a cryptosystem"; it's tough to do a good bones
>version of code if you're concerned about satisfying both the letter and
>spirit of a law to avoid hassles with the government.  On the other hand,
>if you're as big as IBM or even MIT, sometimes you can do it....

So move 100% of the development overseas.  Pick someplace where the labor
is cheaper (maybe the former Soviet Union, but I don't know what their
crypto export laws are like) and develop 100% of the product overseas.  Put
a notice inside each shrink-wrapped box that "This product was forced to be
written overseas, costing American programmers their jobs, by the
shortsightedness of Congress."


2048bit-Fingerprint: F8 A2 A5 15 56 42 9B 16  3F BD 57 0F 8A ED E3 21
No man's life, liberty or property are safe while the legislature is in session.







Thread