1996-01-31 - Re: Lotus Notes

Header Data

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
To: shamrock@netcom.com
Message Hash: 09d43de5ef21d5a1da4534f719551437b992cde74ac212dbfbacdbabbb8c1591
Message ID: <9601310149.AA18887@sulphur.osf.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-31 15:29:06 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 31 Jan 1996 23:29:06 +0800

Raw message

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 1996 23:29:06 +0800
To: shamrock@netcom.com
Subject: Re: Lotus Notes
Message-ID: <9601310149.AA18887@sulphur.osf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>So from who did Lotus license RC4?

RSA, of course.  I don't know the arrangements of RSA's license with
Lotus, of course, but where did someone say that RSA mandated the
keylength that Lotus uses?

Thread

• Return to January 1996

• Return to “Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>”

• 1996-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 23:29:06 +0800) - Re: Lotus Notes - Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>