1996-01-05 - Re: Representations of Pi, etc.

Header Data

From: stevenw@best.com (Steven Weller)
To: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
Message Hash: 0ac07828257aafad3fe9c4a76ae2fadd64e35b7364cf348f315d0c7082fee8c1
Message ID: <v01530502ad12f513af2c@[206.86.1.35]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-05 18:09:27 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 6 Jan 1996 02:09:27 +0800

Raw message

From: stevenw@best.com (Steven Weller)
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 1996 02:09:27 +0800
To: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
Subject: Re: Representations of Pi, etc.
Message-ID: <v01530502ad12f513af2c@[206.86.1.35]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Tim May wrote:

>In summary, I would be surprised to find that a method for calculating the
>Nth digit of pi works for base N but not for base M (modulo some minor
>efficiency factors related to machine architecture, etc.).
>
>Any pointers to this result would be appreciated.

See Peter Borwein's home page:

   http://www.cecm.sfu.ca:80/personal/pborwein/

under _Calculating Pi and Other matters_.



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steven Weller                      |  "The Internet, of course, is more
                                   |  than just a place to find pictures
                                   |  of people having sex with dogs."
stevenw@best.com                   |       -- Time Magazine, 3 July 1995







Thread