From: tallpaul@pipeline.com (tallpaul)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 0b6daa04469d2a35881d6a19bcf12dbc5fe13742adb9352c9781bf4a2b692b81
Message ID: <199601040042.TAA29802@pipe6.nyc.pipeline.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-04 03:27:02 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 4 Jan 1996 11:27:02 +0800
From: tallpaul@pipeline.com (tallpaul)
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 1996 11:27:02 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re:US calls for measures against Internet porn
Message-ID: <199601040042.TAA29802@pipe6.nyc.pipeline.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Jan 03, 1996 14:47:35, 'anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com' wrote:
>My original post, "US calls for measures against Internet porn" was a
>satire. The entire point was that, by changing a few words in the
>"China calls for measures against Internet porn" story, a statement by
>a totalitarian communist regime could be made to look like official US
>policy. Obviously, the project was a success, as people are taking it
>seriously in spite of the fact that it had telltale clues, and that
>the original source was revealed.
>
I was going to post on this topic, especially on a paraphrase of the
(ostensible) original. I still want to, but let me play either the
skeptical or responsible journalist (reader's choice of adjectives).
Anonymous has *not* revealled the original source as he/it/she claimed.
They have asserted it came from Xinhua news agency. Will Anonymous post a
pointer to where we can access on the internet the original? News feed,
date, and time of posting, as well as message ID should suffice.
-- tallpaul
-- Any political analysis that fits on a bumper sticker is wrong.
Return to January 1996
Return to “tallpaul@pipeline.com (tallpaul)”