From: daw@quito.CS.Berkeley.EDU (David A Wagner)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 1b0c0b31f0aae214644410ec32c3b5a65a6654e6564086153618a7d3e4ec277b
Message ID: <199601192231.RAA28578@bb.hks.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-20 03:46:24 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 20 Jan 1996 11:46:24 +0800
From: daw@quito.CS.Berkeley.EDU (David A Wagner)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 1996 11:46:24 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Netscape and NSA
Message-ID: <199601192231.RAA28578@bb.hks.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In article <199601191702.LAA12547@proust.suba.com>,
Alex Strasheim <cp@proust.suba.com> wrote:
> The Lotus approach is totally unacceptable. [...]
> This is the first wave of guys hitting the beach. [...]
> We don't have a lot of options in terms of strategy.
Let's hack Lotus.
Let's put out a binary patch which defeats Lotus's GAK.
Let's look for weaknesses in their crypto implementation.
Time for me to go looking for a Unix version of Lotus Notes 4.
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service. A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service
iQBFAwUBMQAbwyoZzwIn1bdtAQGliAF/bz+i9Uu6N1gK0g/2G7WfN3Wv7zQJVRFG
csq1ROPrZE65kzRYa8uwo8xjVszSDbrf
=0yvk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to January 1996
Return to “daw@quito.CS.Berkeley.EDU (David A Wagner)”
1996-01-20 (Sat, 20 Jan 1996 11:46:24 +0800) - Re: Netscape and NSA - daw@quito.CS.Berkeley.EDU (David A Wagner)