1996-01-04 - Re: Massey, CEO of Compuserve, on Internet

Header Data

From: “Robert A. Rosenberg” <hal9001@panix.com>
To: Tony Iannotti <tony@secapl.com>
Message Hash: 1f28d1bd5c041bc4b476bed32a6e49411f1b79566ec9be6d8e21df41dca04ee5
Message ID: <v02140a09ad1122805d62@[165.254.158.229]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-04 19:55:16 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 5 Jan 1996 03:55:16 +0800

Raw message

From: "Robert A. Rosenberg" <hal9001@panix.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 1996 03:55:16 +0800
To: Tony Iannotti <tony@secapl.com>
Subject: Re: Massey, CEO of Compuserve, on Internet
Message-ID: <v02140a09ad1122805d62@[165.254.158.229]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 16:30 1/3/96, Tony Iannotti wrote:

>On Wed, 3 Jan 1996, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
>
>> CIS always knows where you are dialing in from. Here is the start of a
>> typical connection (using the Mac Program NAVIGATOR).
>>
>> >0001NUH
[snip]
>> That NUH identifies that I am calling in via a V34 Node in NYC and the T01
>> says I got the first modem on the Rotory. If CIS wanted to restrict access
>> via the NYS nodes, that NUH would be an adequate flag to trigger this
>> action.
>
>Wouldn't this require some software routines added to check for this?  I
>expect the decision to build or buy is what CIS is now weighing. Also, I
>would imagine that a German could always call a POP outside the country if
>they wanted to pay for it..... (note that I am still not in favor of the
>action, but these are probably CIS's considerations.)

Yes it would require that the Node be checked in the Software. What I was
responding to was a claim that there is no way of telling where I am
connecting from (which I disproved). As to calling a non-German Node, that
is always an option.







Thread