1996-01-29 - Re: “Concryption” Prior Art

Header Data

From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 2a99a5c99e29fac5da08e10ce6b4b9358e546276035a1082d4ed20d3920aefb9
Message ID: <199601290832.AAA09285@ix10.ix.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-29 08:55:27 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 29 Jan 1996 16:55:27 +0800

Raw message

From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 1996 16:55:27 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: "Concryption" Prior Art
Message-ID: <199601290832.AAA09285@ix10.ix.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>>However the Con-cryption patent covers first compressing, then
>>encrypting.
>
>Isn't that how PGP does its thing (first compress the data and then feed it
>into the Encryption Stage)? PGP is prior art in-and-of-itself.

Peter Wayner posted that the "new" thing about the way they do it is
that it saves time by combining the steps.  But I think I've seen
approximately the same done with arithmetic-coding compression?
#--
#				Thanks;  Bill
# Bill Stewart, stewarts@ix.netcom.com, Pager/Voicemail 1-408-787-1281
#
# "Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty" used to mean us watching
# the government, not the other way around....






Thread