1996-01-30 - Re: Sad state of affairs

Header Data

From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
To: Mike McNally <m5@dev.tivoli.com>
Message Hash: 2b3993c7f569499fedb6cde695ac11d506e5a596e4936a1ebb516a4736c5198e
Message ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960130101401.8758B-100000@chivalry>
Reply To: <9601301402.AA15555@alpha>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-30 21:18:50 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 31 Jan 1996 05:18:50 +0800

Raw message

From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 1996 05:18:50 +0800
To: Mike McNally <m5@dev.tivoli.com>
Subject: Re: Sad state of affairs
In-Reply-To: <9601301402.AA15555@alpha>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960130101401.8758B-100000@chivalry>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Tue, 30 Jan 1996, Mike McNally wrote:

> 
> bofur@alpha.c2.org writes:
>  > It's a pretty sad statement of how poorly this list is functioning when
>  > the RC2 source can be publically released but people would rather
>  > sling mud over glorified keystroke trappers and rant about Nazi deathcamps.
> 
> YIPPPEEE!!!  HOORAY!!!  YA HOOO!!!!!  RC2 IS PUBLIC!!!!  GOD BLESS US
> ALL!!!  HOORAAAAAAY!!!!  YAY!!!!!
> 
:-)

THere is no truth in the report that Algorithm choosers were added to
BSAFE so it would be easier to leave RC2 out :-) Assuming this is RC2, 
that is...

When someone reverse engineered Prince (the algorithm formerly known as 
RC4), that was significant as the code was in widespread use, and was a 
nice fast stream cypher, which was pretty much an empty niche. RC2 is 
fighting for an already populated area, battling IDEA, 3DES, etc, etc. 

Oh yeah, and RC4 is really pretty, whereas RC2, is as ugly as DES and friends






Thread