From: Bryce <wilcoxb@nagina.cs.colorado.edu>
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 96 14:28:10 PST
To: e$@thumper.vmeng.com, cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: bad PGP signatures
In-Reply-To: <v02120d04ad1ddb75f3c3@[199.0.65.105]>
Message-ID: <199601132227.PAA28717@nagina.cs.colorado.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

 An entity calling itself Bob Hettinga is alleged to have 
written:
>
> How 'bout this one, Bryce?
> 
> ;-)


Yep.  That one (mine, for those watching at home) verifies.  My
first guess is that it is because my messages are formatted for
64 columns and all the other messages that are failing to 
verify (like:

To: mix-l@vishnu.alias.net, remailer-operators@c2.org, \
cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: New Mailing List (encrypted)
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 1996 13:42:49 -0600
From: John Perry <perry@vishnu.alias.net>

which just came through) are formatted for 80 or 79 or 78.


Perhaps thumper is chewing on lines longer than 78 or 76 or 
something.


Just a guess.


Bryce

PGP sig (New!  With cleartext timestamp!) follows


Sat Jan 13 15:26:48 MST 1996


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Auto-signed under Unix with 'BAP' Easy-PGP v1.01

iQCVAwUBMPgxzfWZSllhfG25AQFu8QQAj/kc4jgYaKV4QAtvQDiZFIVSBPcgY1qR
4yJWNhlAioQ1I9g0WYiZjxUfa0hl+B77slSM362uaZxvotU1E440bpiZGMcaItBb
ebUDW0UxyhLnUEgcMqo5S8B9mY8eVKiV8j/VASt4bu7RexTyCuRU7VM8FDxj8Vpv
If1nqAsWTNg=
=Hilf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----