From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
To: Tom Johnston <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 3913994017917309f627784067841aac9f0ced12a934794e9d96cb2ee47f4fa2
Message ID: <v02120d0fad236da5978f@[192.0.2.1]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-19 16:44:40 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 20 Jan 1996 00:44:40 +0800
From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 1996 00:44:40 +0800
To: Tom Johnston <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: CryptoAPI and export question
Message-ID: <v02120d0fad236da5978f@[192.0.2.1]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 18:07 1/17/96, Tom Johnston wrote:
>Two points: the CSP development kit is export-controlled; and signing a
>CSP developed by a foreign vendor is treated as a export -- so the signature
>is export-controlled.
>
>We would ship a CSP development kit to a foreign vendor, and sign a CSP
>developed by the foreign vendor, but only with the appropriate export licenses.
So the main thing that the new MS CSP accomplishes is to establish a
standard that will prevent foreigners at the OS level from using real
crypto with popular applications. Way to go Microsoft.
-- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com>
PGP encrypted mail preferred.
Return to January 1996
Return to “shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)”
1996-01-19 (Sat, 20 Jan 1996 00:44:40 +0800) - Re: CryptoAPI and export question - shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)