1996-01-05 - Re: "Concryption"

Header Data

From: anonymous@freezone.remailer
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 3ad001aff40e0ee5b17a5aa6faf43cf8c6f2cbfea250f315b11af5bec06817de
Message ID: <199601050105.UAA29900@light.lightlink.com>
Reply To: <199601041435.PAA16631@utopia.hacktic.nl>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-05 01:27:43 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 5 Jan 1996 09:27:43 +0800

Raw message

From: anonymous@freezone.remailer
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 1996 09:27:43 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: \"Concryption\"
In-Reply-To: <199601041435.PAA16631@utopia.hacktic.nl>
Message-ID: <199601050105.UAA29900@light.lightlink.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Does anyone understand what this "Concryption" really is? Reading the
press blurbs, it could be nothing more than simply compressing the
stream before encrypting it. A patent on that idea would be rather
awkward.

Thread

• Return to January 1996

• Return to “anonymous@freezone.remailer”
• Return to “attila <attila@primenet.com>”

• Return to “nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)”

• 1996-01-04 (Thu, 4 Jan 1996 22:53:38 +0800) - "Concryption" - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
  • 1996-01-05 (Fri, 5 Jan 1996 09:27:43 +0800) - Re: "Concryption" - anonymous@freezone.remailer
    • 1996-01-05 (Fri, 5 Jan 1996 16:20:38 +0800) - Re: "Concryption" - attila <attila@primenet.com>