From: wlkngowl@unix.asb.com (Mutatis Mutantdis)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 96 18:32:13 PST
To: Wei Dai <Cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: HAVAL (was Re: crypto benchmarks)
Message-ID: <199601220235.VAA11495@UNiX.asb.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Sun, 21 Jan 1996 01:29:49 -0800 (PST), you wrote:

[..]

Now, the *big* question is... any new cryptanalysis that sheds light
on the security of HAVAL? (I haven't yet gotten AC2 if there's info in
there.)  Email to one of the authors of HAVAL said he knew of nothing
but that a recent attack on MD5 didn't apply.