1996-01-13 - Re: Novel use of Usenet and remailers to mailbomb from

Header Data

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 40db2bd369b3b3ceae6d858f35857d7830eabc9ec17a67f0a574519d3e5aeafa
Message ID: <NqBmHD14w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Reply To: <2.2.32.19960113002203.00906fc0@mail.teleport.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-13 06:57:33 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 13 Jan 1996 14:57:33 +0800

Raw message

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 1996 14:57:33 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Novel use of Usenet and remailers to mailbomb from
In-Reply-To: <2.2.32.19960113002203.00906fc0@mail.teleport.com>
Message-ID: <NqBmHD14w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Alan Olsen <alano@teleport.com> writes:
...
> Pretty nasty variation on a "denial of service" attack.  What next?  Fake
> "David Rhodes does e-cash" messages with the target's e-mail address?

I've seen worse on soc.culture.*. :-)

I think, an appropriate response for the victim would be to accept only
digitally signed e-mail from people he wishes to receive e-mail from, and
to junk all other e-mail (unsigned or from strangers).

---

Dr. Dimitri Vulis
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps





Thread