1996-01-26 - Re: “Concryption” Prior Art
Header Data
From: “Robert A. Rosenberg” <hal9001@panix.com>
To: pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz
Message Hash: 418b18aaaa6c581d42aab7d6fa6f4bc1ad59c724b0cfb49d617dd6430aeef3aa
Message ID: <v02140a00ad2e2ce86dc4@[165.254.158.226]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-26 21:11:11 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 27 Jan 1996 05:11:11 +0800
Raw message
From: "Robert A. Rosenberg" <hal9001@panix.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 1996 05:11:11 +0800
To: pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz
Subject: Re: "Concryption" Prior Art
Message-ID: <v02140a00ad2e2ce86dc4@[165.254.158.226]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 19:04 1/26/96, pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz wrote:
>However the Con-cryption patent covers first compressing, then
>encrypting.
Isn't that how PGP does its thing (first compress the data and then feed it
into the Encryption Stage)? PGP is prior art in-and-of-itself.
Thread
Return to January 1996
Return to ““Robert A. Rosenberg” <hal9001@panix.com>”
1996-01-26 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 05:11:11 +0800) - Re: “Concryption” Prior Art - “Robert A. Rosenberg” <hal9001@panix.com>