1996-01-02 - Re: Guerilla ISP’s… (fwd)

Header Data

From: Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 501c190287fd79306ad6401f0c5d8ae4b35fc087749d62f59ce525c8427bd8a0
Message ID: <199601020316.VAA00545@einstein.ssz.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-02 03:26:34 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 2 Jan 1996 11:26:34 +0800

Raw message

From: Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 1996 11:26:34 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Guerilla ISP's... (fwd)
Message-ID: <199601020316.VAA00545@einstein.ssz.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text



Forwarded message:

> Date: Mon, 1 Jan 1996 18:49:28 -0800
> From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
> Subject: Re: Guerilla ISP's...
> 
> At 20:19 1/1/96, Jim Choate wrote:
> >Has anyone looked at operating systems like Plan 9 which divide the services
> >into 3 sets (terminal, file, process) and then distribute them over various
> >machines (and cpu's in multi-cpu systems) on a 'cost' basis?
> >
> >This would effectively address the issue of where named, httpd, or whatever
> >was running. Mainly because it would never run on the same machine (or cpu)
> >each time or necessarily all the time (ie run a while here then over there).
> 
> That is called a conspiracy. The consequence is that all machines involved
> will be confiscated and their respective owners jailed.
> 

Wow, you mean you can prosecute an operating system?






Thread