From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
To: a-kurtb@microsoft.com
Message Hash: 569e5b71054fb05da6dcc61e86cf562c177b996124a6ac00deef4f37117fca9d
Message ID: <2.2.32.19960118121001.00943868@panix.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-18 12:07:34 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 18 Jan 96 04:07:34 PST
From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 96 04:07:34 PST
To: a-kurtb@microsoft.com
Subject: Re: underground digital economy
Message-ID: <2.2.32.19960118121001.00943868@panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 10:27 PM 1/17/96 -0600, Jim Miller wrote:
>This is the part that bothers me. Wouldn't a gateway between anonymous
>e-money and identified e-money would stick out like a sore thumb to
>agencies tracking the flow of identified e-money? Wouldn't identified
>e-money trails start and/or terminate at the gateway? Once the gateway is
>discovered, all clients on the identified e-money side of the gateway
>would be discovered.
But those clients could be shell companies given to the "real" users. As
long as one has a continuing opportunity for anonymous *spending* you can
transfer the value of the underground e-cash into useful goods and services.
DCF
Return to January 1996
Return to “Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>”
1996-01-18 (Thu, 18 Jan 96 04:07:34 PST) - Re: underground digital economy - Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>