From: Kent Briggs <kbriggs@execpc.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 1996 00:21:03 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: SHA-2
Message-ID: <199601281605.LAA10612@bb.hks.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

>I think that has a bit to do with a question I had, whether it was SHA
>and SHA-1 (aka "Revised SHA") but I've found the revised version being
>referred to as "SHA-2" in a couple of sources and went with that....
>unless there *is* a third revision...?!?
>
>Problem is the memo I saw still referred to the revised algorithm as
>SHA.  (Anyone have a URL for FIPS 180-1 Please...?)
>
>Rob.
>

It is SHA-1.  Look for FIP180-1.TXT on NIST's BBS at (301)-948-5140.
I think they also have a web site but I don't have the URL (try Yahoo).

Kent


- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service.  A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service

iQBFAwUBMQue3CoZzwIn1bdtAQFd3AGA0hJA7VvzmikZ8lC3ZPnkudPvpnivBi6e
sabfhN3DZXGYuhuOrHsEbYVmiTSfLPUK
=V5G8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----