From: “Bob Bruen, MIT Lab for Nuclear Science” <BRUEN@mitlns.mit.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 5aeb21204205eaeef859842d4f98fa9fab3c08a1fe6f5925de4879d57a8bebff
Message ID: <960102200837.4460036b@mitlns.mit.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-03 09:24:59 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 3 Jan 1996 17:24:59 +0800
From: "Bob Bruen, MIT Lab for Nuclear Science" <BRUEN@mitlns.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 1996 17:24:59 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: RE: Why Net Censorship Doesn't Work
Message-ID: <960102200837.4460036b@mitlns.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
DCF wrote:
>Thought control is a very difficult task. It always has been. The
>Inquisition, Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union, and the People's Republic of
>China tried but three of the four are no longer with us. Short of
>totalitarian controls, thought controls will be ineffective. And
>totalitarian controls are difficult to impose these days.
While thought control is difficult, one cannot ignore the damage done
trying to do it. All of the above examples were expensive in terms of
human suffering and death toll for long periods of time. The controls
were effective for some time with long periods for recovery. The facists
may lose in the end but the price of victory is very high. I fear the
current and future efforts at controls will be costly no matter what
the outcome.
bob
Return to January 1996
Return to ““Bob Bruen, MIT Lab for Nuclear Science” <BRUEN@mitlns.mit.edu>”
1996-01-03 (Wed, 3 Jan 1996 17:24:59 +0800) - RE: Why Net Censorship Doesn’t Work - “Bob Bruen, MIT Lab for Nuclear Science” <BRUEN@mitlns.mit.edu>