1996-01-24 - Re: IPSEC == end of firewalls

Header Data

From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
To: perry@piermont.com
Message Hash: 5b3d11d132daf0c8e41a57d80e4369d4b784ee4c3877f9839fc1b5ce5f20fb23
Message ID: <199601240726.XAA16476@netcom6.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-24 08:02:14 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 24 Jan 1996 16:02:14 +0800

Raw message

From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 1996 16:02:14 +0800
To: perry@piermont.com
Subject: Re: IPSEC == end of firewalls
Message-ID: <199601240726.XAA16476@netcom6.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>Bill Frantz writes:
>> At least maybe I can avoid Perry's wrath for an off topic post :-).
>
>Just for reference, the topic of firewalls and whether cryptographic
>tools render them obsolete is not off topic for cypherpunks. In fact,
>its one of the rare topics that is actually totally proper here...

Expressed that way, I must agree.  However, I think we also agree that
firewalls in general should be elsewhere.

Bill







Thread