From: Joe Thomas <jthomas@access.digex.net>
To: Tom Johnston <tomj@microsoft.com>
Message Hash: 5b99cf67480573c2927565b1427750b164ec275105ac1f7681a7910c568a6378
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960118010940.11392A-100000@access1.digex.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-18 06:21:50 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 18 Jan 1996 14:21:50 +0800
From: Joe Thomas <jthomas@access.digex.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 1996 14:21:50 +0800
To: Tom Johnston <tomj@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: CryptoAPI and export question
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960118010940.11392A-100000@access1.digex.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Wed, 17 Jan 1996, Tom Johnston wrote:
> Two points: the CSP development kit is export-controlled; and signing a
> CSP developed by a foreign vendor is treated as a export -- so the signature
> is export-controlled.
The *signature* is export controlled?!? What the hell kind of sophistry
could the State Department use to deny an export license to a signature?
Joe
Return to January 1996
Return to “Joe Thomas <jthomas@access.digex.net>”
1996-01-18 (Thu, 18 Jan 1996 14:21:50 +0800) - Re: CryptoAPI and export question - Joe Thomas <jthomas@access.digex.net>