1996-01-10 - Re: Bignum support added to XLISP 2.1h
Header Data
From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
To: pcw@access.digex.net (Peter Wayner)
Message Hash: 5d5ae1b3de8c089ba8cc069d047508f45b9f7715fa973915305ebf739568a139
Message ID: <199601101736.MAA15287@jekyll.piermont.com>
Reply To: <v02130502ad193fbd1b75@[199.125.128.5]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-10 18:03:02 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 11 Jan 1996 02:03:02 +0800
Raw message
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 1996 02:03:02 +0800
To: pcw@access.digex.net (Peter Wayner)
Subject: Re: Bignum support added to XLISP 2.1h
In-Reply-To: <v02130502ad193fbd1b75@[199.125.128.5]>
Message-ID: <199601101736.MAA15287@jekyll.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Peter Wayner writes:
> Many cypherpunks might enjoy programming in XLISP 2.1h because the freely
> available implementation of LISP now offers support for BIGNUMS.
Almost all scheme implementations do the same, but scheme is
a lot cleaner than XLISP...
.pm
Thread
Return to January 1996
- Return to “grimm@MIT.EDU”
- Return to “pcw@access.digex.net (Peter Wayner)”
- Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>”
Return to “Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>”
- 1996-01-10 (Thu, 11 Jan 1996 00:35:08 +0800) - Bignum support added to XLISP 2.1h - pcw@access.digex.net (Peter Wayner)
- 1996-01-10 (Thu, 11 Jan 1996 02:03:02 +0800) - Re: Bignum support added to XLISP 2.1h - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
- 1996-01-15 (Sun, 14 Jan 96 20:39:30 PST) - Re: Bignum support added to XLISP 2.1h - Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
- 1996-01-15 (Mon, 15 Jan 96 09:36:41 PST) - Re: Bignum support added to XLISP 2.1h - grimm@MIT.EDU