From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 65aa658c280797651dd11b373c1ea639f22335c1378e167050628650d5c3aa59
Message ID: <199601260940.BAA26226@ix7.ix.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-27 12:27:26 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 27 Jan 1996 20:27:26 +0800
From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 1996 20:27:26 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: "Gentlemen do not read each other's mail"
Message-ID: <199601260940.BAA26226@ix7.ix.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 02:47 PM 1/25/96 -0500, Perry wrote:
>Why is he our patron saint? He was a government official coming out
>against invasion of privacy. Isn't that what we are all after, in the
>end? The reason we deploy cryptography is to assure privacy for
>all. We often refer to those who listen in on conversations
>(regardless of who they are) as, in some sense, our
>opposition. Therefore, is not Stimson's remark in closing down
>Yardley's "Black Chamber" to be praised rather than attacked?
These days, I'd be happy with "Gentlemen only read _each others'_ mail"....
#--
# Thanks; Bill
# Bill Stewart, stewarts@ix.netcom.com, Pager/Voicemail 1-408-787-1281
#
# "Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty" used to mean us watching
# the government, not the other way around....
Return to January 1996
Return to “Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>”
1996-01-27 (Sat, 27 Jan 1996 20:27:26 +0800) - Re: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail” - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>