From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
To: Peter Monta <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 6c0f6fbfb78cebc74593da17c349544b71803c16a202211d989fecfc5149b044
Message ID: <199601040341.TAA19626@netcom5.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-04 12:26:50 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 4 Jan 1996 20:26:50 +0800
From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 1996 20:26:50 +0800
To: Peter Monta <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Guerilla ISPs
Message-ID: <199601040341.TAA19626@netcom5.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 14:07 1/3/96 -0800, Peter Monta wrote:
>I'm skeptical about cable modems---few cable providers have adequate
>return paths, and everyone competes for the downlink bandwidth.
>Broadcast is not the right architecture.
I would be skeptical too, but the cable modems I reviewed in a marketing
research focus group were from HP. My view of HP's reputation is that when
they claim their equipment does something, it does. Does anyone want to
offer counter examples?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz Periwinkle -- Computer Consulting
(408)356-8506 16345 Englewood Ave.
frantz@netcom.com Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA
Return to January 1996
Return to “frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)”
1996-01-04 (Thu, 4 Jan 1996 20:26:50 +0800) - Re: Guerilla ISPs - frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)