From: Richard Charles Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 8710ae3ce9aae2fd9eb0099f54f5e9fc6254f1d5ff46718f129d83d1189edbb9
Message ID: <199601091019.CAA27132@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-09 10:19:52 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 9 Jan 96 02:19:52 PST
From: Richard Charles Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 96 02:19:52 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Microsoft white paper on Access "security"
Message-ID: <199601091019.CAA27132@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Apparently the file name of the official position on Access security is
wx1051.exe. It should be on CompuServe and www/ftp.microsoft.com.
Among other wondrous things, Peter Miller writes in article
<4crdu2$gua@news-e1a.megaweb.com> in comp.databases.ms-access:
BTW, there's a typo in the White Paper. Where it says Access security
relies upon 'RSA4 data encryption', they meant to say 'you not knowing
the difference between a secure database application, and one that
just contains a bunch of security dialogs that confuses the average
user, but fails to protect either your code or your data'.
I bet someone's going to have a lot of fun with this one!!!
-rich
Return to January 1996
Return to “Richard Charles Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>”
1996-01-09 (Tue, 9 Jan 96 02:19:52 PST) - Microsoft white paper on Access “security” - Richard Charles Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>