From: groundfog@alpha.c2.org
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 88111dcda21b41cf9123cdf656f5e7e645901d57bdf32a4a11a672045f1b4fd1
Message ID: <199601010311.WAA12624@mail.FOUR.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-01 03:34:18 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 1 Jan 1996 11:34:18 +0800
From: groundfog@alpha.c2.org
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 1996 11:34:18 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: For the New Year: A Symbol for Information Freedom
Message-ID: <199601010311.WAA12624@mail.FOUR.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
In talk.politics.crypto, ptupper@direct.ca (Peter Tupper) wrote:
> A Symbol for Information Freedom
> by Peter Tupper <ptupper@direct.ca>
> 1996 is off to a discouraging start when it comes to the
>future of information freedom. The American Congress seems
>determined to impose censorship on the Internet. The legal
>status of strong dual-key cryptography is still in debate.
>Telephone companies, cable TV services and publishing services
>are all eagerly trying to seize control of the Internet and
>eliminate the many-to-many nature of the medium. The accidental
>wonder that is the Internet seems to be threatened on all sides,
>in danger of being destroyed or denatured before reaching its
>potential.
> My proposal is only a small contribution to the solutions to
>this problem. I believe a symbol is needed; a simple yet
>recognizable item that will communicate to others that you are:
> -for freedom of speech and expression in all realms,
>particularly via computer mediated communications.
> -against the imposition of arbitrary community standards by
>centralized authority on communications.
> -for making access to communications available to everyone.
> -against the violation of individual privacy by wiretapping,
>intercepting computer communications, compiling dossiers by
>government or commercial organizations or other forms of
>surveillance.
> -for making strong, dual-key encryption programs without
>back-doors available to the public.
> -against building surveillance measures into communications
>and financial infrastructures.
> -for a future of communications that is by, for and of the
>people, not the state or the market.
> The symbol I have chosen is the paper clip. Why a paper
>clip?
> There are many reasons:
> Pragmatic: Paper clips are readily available for
>practically nothing, all over the world. They can be applied to
>collars, lapels, scarves, pocket edges, suspenders and neck ties
>without damaging them and without risk of the pin breaking the
>skin.
> Aesthetic: The paper clip is a simple, elegant design that
>is easily recognized the world over. It can be rendered in many
>colors or plated with precious metals.
> Symbolic: The paper clip is a simple but effective piece of
>technology. An individual uses it to bundle together documents
>from disparate sources to create a unified document upon a given
>subject, which may be dismantled and remade for another topic.
>Furthermore, a paper clip may be bent out of its regular shape
>and used as an improvised tool for any number of purposes.
> Historic: During the German occupation of Norway in World
>War II, Norwegians wore paper clips on their collars as a sign of
>solidarity against the invaders.
> Commercial: While anybody can obtain a plain paper clip
>with little trouble, funds for Information Freedom can be raised
>by marketing electroplated or designer paper clips.
> The cause of awareness of and activism about AIDS had a
>simple, readily recognized symbol, the folded red ribbon. Just
>as every celebrity who wears a red ribbon, no matter how trite
>and self-promoting it is, is a reminder to those watching that
>AIDS is happening and that many people are concerned,
>celebrities appearing at the Academy Awards or Grammies with a
>designer, gold-plated paper clip on their outfit reminds the
>world that information freedom is under fire and that people are
>concerned. It will make the Internet community a visible reality
>in the public sphere. It will bring these issues into the public
>eyes, and give those involved a rallying symbol. It will make a
>small difference, but it will contribute to the greater good.
>
Advertising couldn't hurt.
Return to January 1996
Return to “Jiri Baum <jirib@sweeney.cs.monash.edu.au>”