1996-01-14 - Re: A pooled e-cash FOIA request

Header Data

From: Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
To: Charlie Merritt <cmerritt@intellinet.com>
Message Hash: 90e66d7c3505f3e53e75d1b63d29a2e3b2c958dd38f141d5194c10403bfc6b8f
Message ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.960114163455.9636A-100000@larry.infi.net>
Reply To: <199601141930.NAA14451@intellinet.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-14 21:37:18 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 14 Jan 96 13:37:18 PST

Raw message

From: Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 96 13:37:18 PST
To: Charlie Merritt <cmerritt@intellinet.com>
Subject: Re: A pooled e-cash FOIA request
In-Reply-To: <199601141930.NAA14451@intellinet.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.960114163455.9636A-100000@larry.infi.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



> 
> It has been suggested to me that individual law suits against the
> the low level people that CAN be identified might be an approach.
> Sue for violation of constitutional rights.
> The depositions would work like a grand jury invrestigation.
> "Well, Agent Smith, if you were just following orders
> WHO gave them to you?"  Sue your way up the line.

    This is the way federal prosecutors work. They put the squeeze on
some people to get them to squeel, or even wear a wire or testify against 
their erstwhile companions.





Thread