From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 9749def417fe20b0ab176253fe8d54a917e9d81613a35664814fb2db6c52096a
Message ID: <199601091608.LAA16877@pipe2.nyc.pipeline.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-09 16:23:37 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 10 Jan 1996 00:23:37 +0800
From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 1996 00:23:37 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Eavesdrop Law
Message-ID: <199601091608.LAA16877@pipe2.nyc.pipeline.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
As variation on the recent discussion of employee e-rights,
WSJ today:
New eavesdropping law creates labor-management tussle in
Illinois.
The Illinois AFL-CIO is going to court to fight a provision
in a bill Gov. Jim Edgar signed last month that the labor
group says allows employers to listen in on employees'
conversations "for virtually any reason." A spokesman for
the Illinois Retail Merchants Association, the provision's
prime backer, says such fears are "wild speculation."
Critics say the provision's language, allowing monitoring
for "service quality control or for educational, training,
or research purposes," is far too broad.
The retail merchants association notes that employers are
responsible for the conduct of employees who deal with
customers over the phone.
Return to January 1996
Return to “John Young <jya@pipeline.com>”
1996-01-09 (Wed, 10 Jan 1996 00:23:37 +0800) - Eavesdrop Law - John Young <jya@pipeline.com>