1996-01-03 - Re: Risks of writing a remailer

Header Data

From: ghio@c2.org (Matthew Ghio)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 981184d06d2bbf4d2acdd098e8cf4a5c0331098cd31e182b38540b6e2ebce46f
Message ID: <m0tXKOW-000ungC@myriad>
Reply To: <199601022345.AAA04572@utopia.hacktic.nl>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-03 04:22:55 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 3 Jan 1996 12:22:55 +0800

Raw message

From: ghio@c2.org (Matthew Ghio)
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 1996 12:22:55 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Risks of writing a remailer
In-Reply-To: <199601022345.AAA04572@utopia.hacktic.nl>
Message-ID: <m0tXKOW-000ungC@myriad>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Anonymous (nobody@flame.alias.net) wrote:
>   What are the legal risks of writing (and releasing) a remailer,
>  and what steps can an author go to to minimise any unwanted (legal
>  or civil) attention ?

I've never heard of anyone complaining that I wrote a remailer.  A few
were upset at my running a remailer, but nobody every complained that the
software was available.

As far as minimizing attention to yourself, you obviously know how to
post anonymously.





Thread