1996-01-30 - Re: Cyphercoding Training Wheels??

Header Data

From: Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>
To: carboy@hooked.net (Michael E. Carboy)
Message Hash: 989ed09a9760a52c2b3ba63e40cc47086d53b585d6358a921fea0e58ddb546a8
Message ID: <199601301530.KAA07194@homeport.org>
Reply To: <01BAEE8F.D6BF3860@chum-55.ppp.hooked.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-30 17:49:32 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 31 Jan 1996 01:49:32 +0800

Raw message

From: Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 1996 01:49:32 +0800
To: carboy@hooked.net (Michael E. Carboy)
Subject: Re: Cyphercoding Training Wheels??
In-Reply-To: <01BAEE8F.D6BF3860@chum-55.ppp.hooked.net>
Message-ID: <199601301530.KAA07194@homeport.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


Michael E. Carboy wrote:

| I have been lurking as a newbie on the cypherpunks mailing list for =
| 'bout one month.  Have ordered Koblitz book on Number Theory and Applied =
| Cryptography.  As I slowly (and probably painfully) learn some number =
| theory, I would like to start coding, particularly as it would related =
| to encrypting and decrypting stuff.  I ask the community's input as to =
| whether I should use visual basic or visual C++ ??? I am using a =
| windoze95 platform.

When you consider that many of the people who will grab this code &
play with it DON'T run on MS scaffolding (its not really a platform
:), I'd suggest C++, and make sure you isolate the MS specific
portions, so that whatever you do can be ported.

Adam


-- 
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
					               -Hume






Thread