1996-01-05 - Re: Concription [NOISE]

Header Data

From: Corey Minter <cminter@mipos2.intel.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 9f7e371f6b167292449bd34409d8ee7e04a6c6a6689a3af2d966096a31d25645
Message ID: <199601050244.VAA02095@zws388.sc.intel.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-05 03:00:33 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 5 Jan 1996 11:00:33 +0800

Raw message

From: Corey Minter <cminter@mipos2.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 1996 11:00:33 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Concription [NOISE]
Message-ID: <199601050244.VAA02095@zws388.sc.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


anonymous@freezone.remailer wrote:
> Does anyone understand what this "Concryption" really is? Reading the
> press blurbs, it could be nothing more than simply compressing the
> stream before encrypting it. A patent on that idea would be rather
> awkward.

if there is nothing more to concription, then it sounds like a bogus
patent since PGP documents and implements the technique already. 
Maybe it would make a nice trademark though.

Does anyone know if macaroni and cheese combined in one meal is 
patented?  If not, maybe I can go out and patent it. :)

-- 
______________________________________________________________________
Corey Minter | cminter@mipos2.intel.com | (408) 765-1714





Thread