1996-01-25 - Re: Crippled Notes export encryption
Header Data
From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
To: Ulf_Moeller@public.uni-hamburg.de
Message Hash: a16c1a36f8d73b67e4d1cb1c56e8b5e367d723965f019def6348a7f3d7e59ffb
Message ID: <9601250304.AA13006@sulphur.osf.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-25 06:02:02 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 25 Jan 1996 14:02:02 +0800
Raw message
From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 1996 14:02:02 +0800
To: Ulf_Moeller@public.uni-hamburg.de
Subject: Re: Crippled Notes export encryption
Message-ID: <9601250304.AA13006@sulphur.osf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>If you properly apply for a license to export the source code
>(explainig that the source code licensee might add the features
>that he feels are appropriate), is it still a conspiracy?
No it's not a conspiracy. But they will not normally allow you to
export such source.
/r$
Thread
Return to January 1996
Return to “Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>”
1996-01-25 (Thu, 25 Jan 1996 14:02:02 +0800) - Re: Crippled Notes export encryption - Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>