1996-01-04 - I don’t proofread…sorry.

Header Data

From: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a90c4336c639f633a21f2b01c435afb04f0460a1f67212840c79abeca8aeefa0
Message ID: <ad11623905021004b47a@[205.199.118.202]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-04 20:18:51 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 5 Jan 1996 04:18:51 +0800

Raw message

From: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 1996 04:18:51 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: I don't proofread...sorry.
Message-ID: <ad11623905021004b47a@[205.199.118.202]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 5:30 PM 1/4/96, Jim Ray wrote:

>As to the "English lesson," I feel that proofreading messages to
>1200+ people is more important than proofing private e-mail, but
>some folks evidently disagree with me. For an example of posts
>which I feel are properly proofed, please see Tim's posts. They
>aren't perfect English (mine aren't either) but there's evidence
>that he takes the time to proofread them. This not only makes
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>his posts easier to read, it makes them [IMO] more convincing.
>Of course, I usually agree with Tim anyway. [Hi Tim] I'll shut

Thanks for the positive comments, but I need to clear the air about this
"proofreading" business: I usually don't proofread my posts.

I write 'em as fast as I think 'em, then I send 'em!

A few of my longer essays I've proofed, reworked, etc., but mostly I just
respond by typing directly and then sending. I no longer even use a
spelling checker, in fact.

This can probably be guessed by some of you, as I sometimes leave out
words, which careful proofing would normally catch. I figure that informal
communications are tolerant to such informal usages.

I also tend to write in a conversational style, so the agonized structuring
and restructuring that some writers apparently feel they must go through
does not enter in to my own writing. (I'm a relatively fast typist, and am
comfortable composing at the keyboard, which not everone is, of course.)

One thing I try to scrupulously check are the distribution list and the
other message headers, usually because I edit down the distribution list
and sometimes to change the thread title to something more closely related
to my actual message (as I have done here).

--Tim May


We got computers, we're tapping phone lines, we know that that ain't allowed.
---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:----
Timothy C. May              | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
tcmay@got.net  408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA  | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
Higher Power: 2^756839 - 1  | black markets, collapse of governments.
"National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."









Thread