1996-01-28 - Re: OpSec Snooping

Header Data

From: Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
To: Anonymous <nobody@REPLAY.COM>
Message Hash: aec08d097ce98a8d927026722bc0670ee9233d74540ad50376fd9f9f3ef0a1bd
Message ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.960127192856.11084D-100000@larry.infi.net>
Reply To: <199601271430.PAA13276@utopia.hacktic.nl>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-28 00:46:39 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 28 Jan 1996 08:46:39 +0800

Raw message

From: Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 1996 08:46:39 +0800
To: Anonymous <nobody@REPLAY.COM>
Subject: Re: OpSec Snooping
In-Reply-To: <199601271430.PAA13276@utopia.hacktic.nl>
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.960127192856.11084D-100000@larry.infi.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


I would like to see some factual evidence that active-duty or retired spooks 
are better than my late grandmother at spotting a liar. 

What spooks do have is, no lamer press and no
this-quarter's-numbers-define-my-universe stock analysts limelighting
their work. They can afford to work slowly, carefully, methodically. Being
a spook doesn't prove you do do that; it means you can, if you are
inclined to do so (and your bosswants you to do that). 

Alan Horowitz
alanh@norfolk.infi.net






Thread