From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: b6374c0726e729c5fed6c02b1fc45d7e26d65a5db6c269018dfea805c5970354
Message ID: <v02120d0bad22d5072235@[192.0.2.1]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-17 17:00:18 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 18 Jan 1996 01:00:18 +0800
From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 1996 01:00:18 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: DC-Nets and Noise
Message-ID: <v02120d0bad22d5072235@[192.0.2.1]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 1:38 1/17/96, Timothy C. May wrote:
>There are many reasons why mailing lists and subgroups fade out. DC-Nets
>are a hard thing to pull off (anyone see any working versions lately?),
>about as hard to pull off as true digital cash; and with less economic
>benefit, less incentive to do the work. So, I can't say I am, or was,
>surprised that such mailing lists atrophied.
David Chaum told me last year that someone has created a DC net that works
over AppleTalk. Supposedly, it was mentioned at Eurocrypt. Any pointers?
TIA,
-- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com>
PGP encrypted mail preferred.
Return to January 1996
Return to “shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)”
1996-01-17 (Thu, 18 Jan 1996 01:00:18 +0800) - Re: DC-Nets and Noise - shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)