From: daw@boston.CS.Berkeley.EDU (David A Wagner)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: be737e180359729e1a2220a91bd96850f70b8f0490f51c0626a5687de3595b69
Message ID: <199601312154.QAA13453@bb.hks.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-31 22:20:25 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 1 Feb 1996 06:20:25 +0800
From: daw@boston.CS.Berkeley.EDU (David A Wagner)
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 1996 06:20:25 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: [NOISE] Borenstein's Fatal Spam
Message-ID: <199601312154.QAA13453@bb.hks.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In article <pgpmoose.199602010813.60849@paganini.sydney.sterling.com>,
Greg Rose <Greg_Rose@sydney.sterling.com> wrote:
> A number of people have written words to the
> effect of:
> First Virtual, you lost a lot of ground with me.
> (sounds like others feel the same way, too).
>
> I disagree. I think there is a big difference
> between "knowing theoretically that X, Y and Z
> are possible" and "look, I have a program that
> does X, Y and Z in a certain order, and very
> fast, and surprisingly successfully, and this has
> major implications for the banking community".
[...]
> I think most of the problem here is that we heard
> about it in media words first, and in a reasoned
> argument second. That's life.
Ok. Fair enough. Good points.
Personally, what I found most distasteful about FV's post was their
conclusions, not their experimental procedure.
I agree that their keyboard-sniffer lends more evidence to the well-known
argument that, to make good use of crypto, you need secure endpoint machines.
I disagree when FV concludes that this makes crypto useless. Instead, I'd
contend we just need to work to secure our endpoints better; then we can do
all sorts of neat stuff with crypto.
I found their conclusions to be academically displeasing. But I guess
that's what happens when you're trying to sell a product...
- -- Dave Wagner
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service. A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service
iQBFAwUBMQ/lHSoZzwIn1bdtAQG3bQF6AnSQY/3Hy6ha35vI5YrbyF8w7Xq/IcN9
IIwNqUKmrqlugKuduk0A9VqDG9Zi0Ksm
=7awQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to January 1996
Return to “daw@boston.CS.Berkeley.EDU (David A Wagner)”
1996-01-31 (Thu, 1 Feb 1996 06:20:25 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Borenstein’s Fatal Spam - daw@boston.CS.Berkeley.EDU (David A Wagner)