1996-01-21 - Re: DES in real life

Header Data

From: “James A. Donald” <jamesd@echeque.com>
To: froomkin@law.miami.edu>
Message Hash: c026a9175cd50969361351d61b3ffac3009bf6e7040b42471eca38ddeac4b4ee
Message ID: <199601210352.TAA20749@mailx.best.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-21 04:02:07 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 21 Jan 1996 12:02:07 +0800

Raw message

From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 1996 12:02:07 +0800
To: froomkin@law.miami.edu>
Subject: Re: DES in real life
Message-ID: <199601210352.TAA20749@mailx.best.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 07:01 PM 1/20/96 -0500, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>Thats RC4, and it isn't neccessarily better than RC4, especially if
>the RC4 key length is reasonable. No one really knows the strength of RC4.

The shortness and simplicity of RC4 leads me to believe that it must
be strong.   If something that simple had a flaw, the flaw would have
been found by now, whereas more complicated algorithms, such as DES,
might well avoid discovery of their flaws merely by their irregularity and
complexity, which makes analysis tedious.
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
              				|  
We have the right to defend ourselves	|   http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind	|  
of animals that we are. True law	|   James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the	|  
arbitrary power of the state.		|   jamesd@echeque.com






Thread