From: jim@bilbo.suite.com (Jim Miller)
To: a-kurtb@microsoft.com
Message Hash: c1be240935aa0a51ff1d2f6bd3d74f1bc8488e33279f2baabbe35e8e13249098
Message ID: <9601180428.AA11604@bilbo.suite.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-19 16:48:00 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 20 Jan 1996 00:48:00 +0800
From: jim@bilbo.suite.com (Jim Miller)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 1996 00:48:00 +0800
To: a-kurtb@microsoft.com
Subject: Re: underground digital economy
Message-ID: <9601180428.AA11604@bilbo.suite.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> Certainly. There are a couple of ways, but all one needs is
> some sort of gateway to an e-cash
>
This is the part that bothers me. Wouldn't a gateway between anonymous
e-money and identified e-money would stick out like a sore thumb to
agencies tracking the flow of identified e-money? Wouldn't identified
e-money trails start and/or terminate at the gateway? Once the gateway is
discovered, all clients on the identified e-money side of the gateway
would be discovered.
I think the gateway could only succeed if there was a way to perform the
conversion anonymously. But how do you anonymously generate/propagate
identified e-money?
There is probably an obvious solution, but I'm not devious enough to see
it. One unstated assumption I have that may be confounding me is that I
assume the identified e-money system will completely replace paper money,
which will then be "discontinued".
Jim_Miller@suite.com
Return to January 1996
Return to “jim@bilbo.suite.com (Jim Miller)”