From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
To: Frank Willoughby <frankw@in.net>
Message Hash: c5039d93a9fe4ec9a3271ed4f5e93ed43894541f4db6fc5a53192913f2e56305
Message ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960123133910.8668B-100000@chivalry>
Reply To: <9601232016.AA22238@su1.in.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-23 23:29:51 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 24 Jan 1996 07:29:51 +0800
From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 1996 07:29:51 +0800
To: Frank Willoughby <frankw@in.net>
Subject: Re: IPSEC == end of firewalls
In-Reply-To: <9601232016.AA22238@su1.in.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960123133910.8668B-100000@chivalry>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
This thread definitely belongs as cypherpunks, as the whole point of the
discussion is to debate the limits of what cryptography on its own can
achieve.
What do you need as well as crypto before you can remove all firewalls?
Simon
(defun modexpt (x y n) "computes (x^y) mod n"
(cond ((= y 0) 1) ((= y 1) (mod x n))
((evenp y) (mod (expt (modexpt x (/ y 2) n) 2) n))
(t (mod (* x (modexpt x (1- y) n)) n))))
Return to January 1996
Return to “Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>”