1996-01-10 - Re: Microsoft continues to mislead public about Windows security

Header Data

From: kolivet@alpha.c2.org
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: c615be15f4ecc1deb33cd377092b588efbd078608e3d0194eb39b8ca7514a2d2
Message ID: <199601100451.UAA13211@infinity.c2.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-10 05:19:39 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 10 Jan 1996 13:19:39 +0800

Raw message

From: kolivet@alpha.c2.org
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 1996 13:19:39 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Microsoft continues to mislead public about Windows security
Message-ID: <199601100451.UAA13211@infinity.c2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Tue, 9 Jan 1996, Frank Willoughby wrote:

> When a system is breached or a CERT Advisory is issued, this is a major
> embarassment for the company.  The breach (or publicized security flaw)
> shakes the confidence of people in the vendor's products.  People are 
> rather unwilling to risk putting their business-critical data on a system 
> which has just recently breached.  This lack of confidence translates into
> a loss in sales.  If unchecked or the case if severe enough, this could 
> also translate into a loss of jobs.

What are CERT's criteria for a bulletin to be issued?  Would the previously
mentioned Windows NT and Windows 95 security bugs qualify?

- Kay Olivetti






Thread