From: Jonathon Blake <grafolog@netcom.com>
To: “Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>
Message Hash: d2d6a2fe20febfab619a8a4d7eaec48cb36864b638efe27f3e170168e1beaab1
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960116180817.1875C-100000@netcom15>
Reply To: <199601170017.QAA19922@netcom2.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-17 02:46:28 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 17 Jan 1996 10:46:28 +0800
From: Jonathon Blake <grafolog@netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 1996 10:46:28 +0800
To: "Vladimir Z. Nuri" <vznuri@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: remarkable recent stories
In-Reply-To: <199601170017.QAA19922@netcom2.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960116180817.1875C-100000@netcom15>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Vladimir:
On Tue, 16 Jan 1996, Vladimir Z. Nuri wrote:
> - what this all suggests to me is a possible major policy/political
> switch inside the NSA in which possibly someone who is more in favor of
> code making than code breaking is gaining the reigns. its tough to
> guess based on the NSA's entrails, but recent events are some pretty
> odiferous entrails, I'd be interested to here what others think.
Interesting theory. Maybe even factual. I don't know.
Caveat: After decades of secrecy, the NSA has come out
of the cold so to speak. Are we to safely assume that
the NSA has not had it's major mission changed in a few
major ways when it came into the open?
Suppose the NSA was simply being used as a cutout
for its replacement, which is even more sub rosa?
xan
jonathon
grafolog@netcom.com
**********************************************************************
* *
* Opinions expressed don't necessarily reflect my own views. *
* *
* There is no way that they can be construed to represent *
* any organization's views. *
* *
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
* ftp://ftp.netcom.com/pub/gr/graphology/home.html *
* *
***********************************************************************
Return to January 1996
Return to ““Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>”