From: David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: d368d81bfbfa951fed6e302e3f5b5b4d8b30735cee28224532635500c54c1c22
Message ID: <199601292004.PAA04006@nrk.com>
Reply To: <9601291905.AA20307@toad.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-31 03:49:20 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 31 Jan 1996 11:49:20 +0800
From: David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 1996 11:49:20 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Escrowing Viewing and Reading Habits with the Governmen
In-Reply-To: <9601291905.AA20307@toad.com>
Message-ID: <199601292004.PAA04006@nrk.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> Do you really think the FBI believes that asking librarians to keep
> records of customer useage is an efficient way to read the customers minds?
> Do you really think that the FBI foreign counter-intelligence squad has
> nothing better to do than keep a database of who is reading Che Guevara
> memoirs?
>
> Yes.
>
> Heck, I remember this was a big issue about 15 years ago. Try asking
> someone who was active in library science in the late 70's, early 80's.
>
> The general reaction of the library community was, I am glad to say,
> entirely pro-privacy.
Ask Sean at dra.com. The s/w industry even designs library systems
so as to purge data the Feebs might want. That that does not exist can
not be surrendered.
And this is not a cost-free choice to them. There is & will be a
percentage of book vandals. If your circulation system could tell you:
Who checked out X, Y, Z & T?
You might catch the creeps. But they prefer buying new books to the
alternative....
--
A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz@nrk.com
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
Return to January 1996
Return to ““Peter Trei” <trei@process.com>”