1996-01-20 - Re: Hack Lotus?
Header Data
From: grimm@MIT.EDU
To: daw@quito.CS.Berkeley.EDU
Message Hash: d5b3ed9a025abd2455380cdeabaea6e94fdea15c23a5c47530e148d3d9279bbf
Message ID: <9601202117.AA28623@w20-575-84.MIT.EDU>
Reply To: <199601192214.RAA28470@bb.hks.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-20 21:53:56 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 21 Jan 1996 05:53:56 +0800
Raw message
From: grimm@MIT.EDU
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 1996 05:53:56 +0800
To: daw@quito.CS.Berkeley.EDU
Subject: Re: Hack Lotus?
In-Reply-To: <199601192214.RAA28470@bb.hks.net>
Message-ID: <9601202117.AA28623@w20-575-84.MIT.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Pardon my lack of faith in most crypto implementations, but do you
think it is possible that (in the first version of Notes at least) the
escrowed 24-bits will just be stored plaintext in the executable? In
which case, a little disassembly, and we can create a hack to enable
all 64-bits. (Of course, communications from this hacked version will
only be readable by other hacked versions or US versions.)
Anyone else think is probable?
-James
Thread
Return to January 1996
- Return to “daw@quito.CS.Berkeley.EDU (David A Wagner)”
- Return to “grimm@MIT.EDU”
Return to “hallam@w3.org”
- 1996-01-19 (Fri, 19 Jan 96 14:17:37 PST) - Re: Hack Lotus? - daw@quito.CS.Berkeley.EDU (David A Wagner)
- 1996-01-19 (Fri, 19 Jan 96 15:16:13 PST) - Re: Hack Lotus? - hallam@w3.org
- 1996-01-20 (Sun, 21 Jan 1996 05:53:56 +0800) - Re: Hack Lotus? - grimm@MIT.EDU