From: Scott Brickner <sjb@universe.digex.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 1996 03:22:32 +0800
To: tallpaul@pipeline.com (tallpaul)
Subject: Re: Will the real Anonynous please stand up
In-Reply-To: <199601040332.WAA24066@pipe6.nyc.pipeline.com>
Message-ID: <199601041808.NAA06944@universe.digex.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


tallpaul writes:
>Even English monarchs, in centuries past when monarchs like Anonymous only
>had one name, were given some additional signifier to keep them separate
>(e.g. "Donald the Fat" vs. "Donald the Terribly Ugly" vs. "Donald the
>Wonderful With A Really Good Ad Agency"). 

Get a grip.  Those monarchs didn't make those names.  Others did.
You're free to make up your own relative clauses to attach to
"Anonymous" --- if they're good enough maybe others'll start using
them.

Meanwhile, *you* need to consider what reputation statements from
anonymous sources are worth.  One needs some degree of reputation to
make a useful comment on another's.