From: “Michael C. Peponis” <mianigand@unique.outlook.net>
To: Laszlo Vecsey <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: d9ff7618341835bb32accdaaab6d07b3fba5c5ca32ecd54999496deaa3a0f577
Message ID: <199601040009.SAA07299@unique.outlook.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-04 08:23:48 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 4 Jan 1996 16:23:48 +0800
From: "Michael C. Peponis" <mianigand@unique.outlook.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 1996 16:23:48 +0800
To: Laszlo Vecsey <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: 2047 bit keys in PGP
Message-ID: <199601040009.SAA07299@unique.outlook.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Why is there a limit to the size of the key anyway? It's too bad PGP
> doesn't support any size key (within reason).
Within reason is the Key Phrase. Even with a Pentium 90, I notice a
considerable lag in decrypting messages that have been encrypted with
a key larger than 2047/8.
Even if you have a fast machine, if the person recieving the message
could wait a long time to decrypt you 4096 byte encrypted message.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2i
iQCVAwUBMOs4u0UffSIjnthhAQEfigP9GQvgcyuCUxkrPqX/3yDdtwxDGajKbbhY
j90px4tr1Q1sNQue8ywBDdBIQakirTr95QDeGMrC1n0NjSh5+dotUUWiChWLCLS+
AMIsA3LCJr5BzeCOni8bYyz7+alt617cIIYZs0Unt26BKJVI20hU8OgD0oC9K/uR
7WN3YIKff0k=
=TuOD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Regards,
Michael Peponis
PGP Key Avalible form MIT Key Server
Key fingerprint = DD 39 66 3D AE DE 71 C2 B6 DA B2 3F 47 2A EB AC
Return to January 1996
Return to “Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>”