From: “Peter Trei” <trei@process.com>
To: <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: ddf698f30fb7718a06824de4a3c488c807b0ae6554ed01c9b9dcd2339081273d
Message ID: <9601252043.AA06648@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-25 23:01:09 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 26 Jan 1996 07:01:09 +0800
From: "Peter Trei" <trei@process.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 1996 07:01:09 +0800
To: <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Secrecy of NSA Affiliation
Message-ID: <9601252043.AA06648@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Tim writes:
> Also, much other evidence points to the NSA having "gone public" much
> farther back in time than 18-30 months ago. Former DIRNSAs on the
> MacNeil-Lehrer Newshour were always introduced as former directors of the
> NSA. As early as the mid-80s, as I recollect. I think Bamford's book pretty
> much outed the name, though it was widely known before that, of course.
Datapoint: My 1967 HB copy of The Codebreakers discusses the
agency, and includes a photo of the HQ.
Peter Trei
Senior Software Engineer
Purveyor Development Team
Process Software Corporation
http://www.process.com
trei@process.com
Return to January 1996
Return to ““Peter Trei” <trei@process.com>”
1996-01-25 (Fri, 26 Jan 1996 07:01:09 +0800) - Re: Secrecy of NSA Affiliation - “Peter Trei” <trei@process.com>