From: Censored Girls Anonymous <carolann@censored.org>
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 1996 00:41:40 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Certificates: limiting your liability with reuse limitations
Message-ID: <199601120400.VAA26163@usr3.primenet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


In Minnesota, you wouldn't be liable.
All you can do IS all you can do.
Anything else is a crime! (on their part).

Love Always,

Carol Anne

At 05:07 PM 1/11/96 -0800, you wrote:
>You write:

>How do notaries public get around this liability problem?  It seems to me
>that the checking done for a certificate might be similar to the checking
>done by a notary - a glance at a driver's license, say.  Are they subject
>to liability if they are fooled by fake ID?
>
>Hal
>
>
--

Member Internet Society  - Certified BETSI Programmer  -  Webmistress
***********************************************************************
Carol Anne Braddock (cab8)  carolann@censored.org   206.42.112.96
My Homepage
The Cyberdoc
***********************************************************************
------------------ PGP.ZIP Part [017/713] -------------------
M8H,),S$8G>&.WP(8IRA`-M['+`Q%&_C"">5-F%LX@<_Q$;*P'',Q$Z/AA[8M
MF=O0H+*%(-S%&>S%+FS&<LS%3(Q&#W1"<]2%`H^;,]^1C$'HBN8PX$4SYAU^
MPGD<Q0ZLA0D+,`MCT!LA**4M[-JPAK9F?40!AJ,CW"'%DR#:'9?Q)3[%<DQ`
-------------------------------------------------------------
for next chunk to export --> http://dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/export/