1996-01-02 - Re: Guerilla ISP’s…

Header Data

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: ea24c895b724289d3a0fb4c094e73410ea050f9f809b2987216487e7f89c4dbf
Message ID: <v02120d08ad0e4ca3891f@[192.0.2.1]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-02 03:08:52 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 2 Jan 1996 11:08:52 +0800

Raw message

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 1996 11:08:52 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Guerilla ISP's...
Message-ID: <v02120d08ad0e4ca3891f@[192.0.2.1]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 20:19 1/1/96, Jim Choate wrote:
>Has anyone looked at operating systems like Plan 9 which divide the services
>into 3 sets (terminal, file, process) and then distribute them over various
>machines (and cpu's in multi-cpu systems) on a 'cost' basis?
>
>This would effectively address the issue of where named, httpd, or whatever
>was running. Mainly because it would never run on the same machine (or cpu)
>each time or necessarily all the time (ie run a while here then over there).

That is called a conspiracy. The consequence is that all machines involved
will be confiscated and their respective owners jailed.


-- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com>
   PGP encrypted mail preferred.







Thread