1996-01-24 - Re: [local] Report on Portland Cpunks meeting

Header Data

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
To: perry@piermont.com
Message Hash: eae9e2ee4ab80173a743810680d4d2ff60f0200a556058a90ee30784efd0a04a
Message ID: <v02120d5fad2b9e99eb08@[192.0.2.1]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-24 08:51:16 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 24 Jan 1996 16:51:16 +0800

Raw message

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 1996 16:51:16 +0800
To: perry@piermont.com
Subject: Re: [local] Report on Portland Cpunks meeting
Message-ID: <v02120d5fad2b9e99eb08@[192.0.2.1]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 16:40 1/23/96, Perry E. Metzger wrote:

>Each person gets a sheet. Either each person in the room reads their
>fingerprint in turn from their own copy, with each person in the room
>checking the read fingerprint against the fingerprint on the handout,
>or an appointed reader (or set of readers at the last IETF) read the
>fingerprints in turn and ask the owner of the key to then simply say
>"yes" or "its mine" or whatever to verify that the fingerprint matches
>their own copy of the print.

How do they verify that the person confirming the fingerprint is indeed the
person supposedly owning the key?


-- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com>
   PGP encrypted mail preferred.







Thread